FTE Model vs. In-House Staff: Which One is Right for You?
Introduction
Medical billing and coding have become increasingly intricate in
today’s healthcare landscape. Accurate coding, timely claim submissions, and
compliance with constantly changing regulations are essential for maintaining a
healthy revenue cycle. However, many practices—especially smaller ones—struggle
to manage these tasks efficiently while keeping costs under control.
The primary decision healthcare providers face is whether to handle
billing operations in-house or adopt an outsourced
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) model. While the traditional
in-house team offers direct oversight, the FTE model provides access to
certified professionals at a fraction of the cost. But which approach best
suits your practice? Let’s break down the differences and explore why offshore
medical billing and coding services are becoming the go-to solution for many
healthcare providers.
What is the
FTE Model in Medical Billing and Coding?
The Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) model in medical billing and
coding involves hiring dedicated professionals through a specialized offshore
service provider. Unlike traditional outsourcing, FTE staff work exclusively
for your practice, ensuring consistency, accountability, and personalized
service.
These professionals handle end-to-end billing functions, from
patient demographics entry and coding to payment posting and accounts
receivable follow-ups. Practices pay a simple, transparent hourly rate—like the
competitive $7.5 per hour offered by Info Hub Consultancy Services—without the
overhead of salaries, benefits, and infrastructure.
How Does It Work?
·
A dedicated team is assigned to your practice based on workload
requirements.
·
They work in real-time using your existing billing software.
·
Regular performance reports and open communication ensure
seamless integration with your operations.
This model transforms medical billing from a complex,
resource-heavy task into a streamlined, cost-efficient process.
The In-House
Medical Billing Team: A Familiar but Costly Model
Many practices opt for in-house billing teams because of the
perceived control and direct communication. However, this traditional approach
often comes with hidden costs and operational challenges.
Key Challenges of In-House Billing:
1.
Hiring and Training Costs: Recruiting
skilled billers and coders requires time, money, and ongoing training to stay
compliant with industry changes.
2.
Software Expenses: Medical
billing software licenses, updates, and IT support can become significant
financial burdens.
3.
Limited Focus: In-house
staff often juggle multiple administrative tasks, reducing their accuracy and
productivity in billing processes.
While having an on-site team may offer some operational
familiarity, these inefficiencies can lead to delayed payments and increased
denial rates—directly impacting the practice’s financial health.
Cost
Efficiency: FTE Model vs. In-House Staff
Cost savings are often the most compelling reason healthcare
practices switch to the FTE model. Let’s compare the typical expenses:
Cost Component |
In-House Team |
FTE Model |
Salaries (Coder/Biller) |
$25-$30/hour |
$7.5/hour |
Training & Certifications |
$2,000+ per staff/year |
Included |
Software Licenses |
$5,000+ annually |
Covered by offshore team |
Infrastructure (Workstations,
IT) |
$3,000+ annually |
No additional costs |
Turnover & Rehiring
Expenses |
High in the current job
market |
None – managed by service
provider |
By adopting the FTE model, small practices typically reduce
their medical billing costs by 30-40%, reallocating resources to patient care
and practice growth.
Performance
and Accuracy in Medical Billing
Medical billing is unforgiving—minor errors can lead to claim
denials, delayed reimbursements, and potential compliance penalties. FTE
professionals focus exclusively on billing tasks, ensuring greater accuracy and
efficiency.
Certified coders stay updated with ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS code
changes, reducing the likelihood of claim rejections. In-house teams, on the
other hand, often balance multiple roles, increasing the risk of overlooked
details and coding mistakes.
Key Performance Advantages of the FTE Model:
·
Faster claims processing due to task specialization
·
Lower denial rates thanks to meticulous coding practices
·
Proactive denial management and follow-ups to secure timely
reimbursements
Scalability
and Flexibility in Billing Operations
Healthcare practices rarely experience static patient volumes.
Seasonal fluctuations, changing service lines, and growth initiatives demand
flexible staffing models. The FTE model offers unmatched scalability by
adjusting team sizes based on workload demands.
FTE Model:
·
Easy to add or reduce team members without recruitment hassles
·
Adjust billing capacity during peak periods (e.g., flu season)
In-House Team:
·
Requires lengthy hiring and training processes for expansion
·
Risk of underutilized staff during slower periods
Technology
and Compliance Management
Billing regulations evolve constantly, with frequent updates
from CMS, HIPAA requirements, and payer-specific guidelines. Staying
compliant demands continuous education and investment in modern billing
software.
FTE teams from established offshore medical billing and coding
companies receive regular training and use industry-leading software like NextGen, eClinicalWorks, and Kareo.
By contrast, in-house teams often fall behind on updates due to time
constraints and resource limitations.
Case Study:
How Dr. Thompson’s Family Practice Boosted Revenue with the FTE Model
The Challenge:
Dr. Sarah Thompson, who runs a small family practice, struggled
with delayed payments and rising administrative costs. Her in-house team faced
frequent coding errors, contributing to a 25% denial rate and a 40% increase in
unpaid claims over 12 months.
The Solution:
She partnered with Info Hub Consultancy Services to adopt
the FTE Model in Medical Billing and
Coding. A team of certified billers, trained in orthopedic and family
medicine coding, was assigned to her practice at $7.5 per hour.
The Results (in 6 months):
·
Revenue Growth: 35%
increase in collections
·
Improved Accuracy: Denial
rate dropped to 7%
·
Cost Savings: 40%
reduction in operational expenses
Dr. Thompson now enjoys a streamlined billing process and can
focus more on her patients while trusting the ICS team to manage her revenue
cycle.
Why the FTE
Model is a Smart Move for Small Practices
The FTE model offers distinct advantages for healthcare providers
seeking efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings. Here’s why small practices
should consider this approach:
·
Affordable Pricing: Certified
billing experts at just $7.5 per hour.
·
Unmatched Expertise: Access
professionals experienced in over 40 medical specialties.
·
Operational Flexibility: Scale
billing operations without recruitment or training hassles.
·
Advanced Technology: Utilize
cutting-edge billing tools without extra costs.
·
Compliance Confidence: Stay
aligned with HIPAA, ICD-10, CPT, and payer-specific requirements.
By leveraging offshore medical billing and coding services,
practices can enhance their financial performance without compromising on
quality.
Conclusion
Choosing the right staffing model for your medical billing
operations is more than just a cost decision—it’s a strategic move toward
sustainable growth. The Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Model for Medical Billing
and Coding empowers healthcare providers with cost-effective, accurate, and
scalable billing services. With certified professionals working as an extension
of your practice, you’ll experience improved collections, reduced operational
headaches, and greater financial clarity.
As one of the top offshore medical coding
and billing services providers in India, Info Hub Consultancy Services
delivers tailored FTE solutions designed to meet the unique needs of small and
mid-sized healthcare practices. Discover the difference today—contact us at
inquiry@infohubconsultancy.com or call +1 (888) 694-8634. Book a free 30-minute
consultation and receive a complimentary medical billing audit to identify
immediate improvement opportunities.
Comments
Post a Comment